Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02229
Original file (BC 2012 02229.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02229 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

______________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 7 Feb 2011 be declared void and 
removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

 

______________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

On 13 Dec 10, he received a profile with a recommended release 
date of 23 Jan 11 for 41 days. He was inadvertently scheduled 
and tested on 7 Feb 11. He should have been allowed 42-90 days 
to complete a FA after his recommended release date. As a 
result, he failed his FA test. In accordance with the governing 
regulation, if the exemption exceeds 30 days, the member is given 
42 days following the expiration of the exemption for training. 
The earliest he could have been scheduled for testing was 7 Mar 
11. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

______________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving on active duty. 

 

______________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states on 5 Jul 12, the 
applicant was asked to provide a copy of his signed fitness 
assessment score sheet, fitness assessment questionnaire and AF 
IMT 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, 
documenting his limitations/exemptions. He did not provide this 
information. 

 

The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. 

 

______________________________________________________________ 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 28 Aug 12, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, this office has received no response (Exhibit C). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the 
applicant’s contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FA is 
in error or unjust. The AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition 
Report, submitted by the applicant is noted; however, in the 
absence of the fitness assessment scoresheet, fitness assessment 
questionnaire and AF IMT 422, requested by the Air Force office 
of primary responsibility, we find insufficient evidence to 
warrant disturbing the record. However, should the applicant 
provide such evidence, we would be willing to reconsider his 
request. In view of the above and in the absence of evidence to 
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application in 
Executive Session on 11 Mar 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

, Member 

, Member 


 

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-02229: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 May 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 14 Aug 12, w/atch. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Aug 12. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01644

    Original file (BC 2013 01644 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 1, dated 1 July 2010, Para 1.21.8., “exempted members returning from deployment are assessed after the period of acclimatization (42 days from return to home station for RegAF) unless member requests to assess earlier.” On 7 Jan 2014, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), due to “Insufficient evidence; specifically no commander invalidation.” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01664

    Original file (BC 2013 01664.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 1, dated 1 July 2010, Para 1.21.8., “exempted members returning from deployment are assessed after the period of acclimatization (42 days from return to home station for RegAF) unless member requests to assess earlier.” On 7 Jan 2014, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), due to “Insufficient evidence; specifically no commander invalidation.” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03286

    Original file (BC-2012-03286.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03286 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA) scores dated 30 March 2012 and 18 June 2012 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). We took note of the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommendation; however, we agree with the BCMR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05057

    Original file (BC 2013 05057.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05057 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 22 Aug 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In support of his appeal the applicant submits; medical documentation from his visit to the emergency room...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05948

    Original file (BC 2012 05948.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05948 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 4 Jan 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time for medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03145

    Original file (BC-2012-03145.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 29 Oct 12 for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04468

    Original file (BC 2013 04468.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Finally, the applicant did not provide any additional supporting documentation to consider, i.e., commander’s invalidation, AF Form 422, etc.” AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to void and remove the FAs dated 22 Feb 11, 1 Mar 11, and 22 Jun 11. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM and AFPC/DPSIDE evaluations is at Exhibit B and Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01591

    Original file (BC 2013 01591.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 29 Nov 2011, a medical evaluation letter was signed by the same provider who issued the previous AF Form 469s. The letter states, “There are medical conditions that preclude this member from achieving a passing score on the Air Force fitness assessment.” On 1 Dec 2011, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was initiated from his Medical Provider, which could exempt the applicant from the cardio and push-up components of the FA. On 27 Mar 2012, a medical evaluation letter was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04882

    Original file (BC 2013 04882.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 Feb 12 his commander requested base medical evaluate him. The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete FSQ does not invalidate the FA. In this respect, we note the applicant’s submission does not contain sufficient documentation to include; support from his commander requesting the FA be invalidated; AF Form 422 exempting him from the contested...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04056

    Original file (BC-2012-04056.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence provided by the applicant did not include medical provider recommended exemptions for the cardio component. If the medical evaluation validates the illness or injury and provides supporting medical documentation, the Unit Commander may invalidate the FA results by notifying the FAC in writing. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...